QRL MATCH REVIEW
GUIDE
Collective Consistency
Descriptors/Indicators/ Grading Guide
PROCESS
Match Review
PROCESS
Match Review
STEP 1
The Match Review Committee review several key indicators that they take into consideration when ascribing a grading.
These key indicators must be assessed by the Match Review Committee when reviewing the evidence of each case.
The Match Review Committee must assess each of these key factors as low, moderate or high. For Grade 1 Offences, the three key factors would generally be assessed in the low to moderate ranges. For Grade 2 Offences, the three key factors would generally be assessed in the moderate range. For Grade 3 Offences, the three key factors would generally be assessed in the moderate to high ranges.
PROCESS
Match Review
STEP 2
The Match Review Committee must also assess whether there are any other relevant factors that be taken into consideration when ascribing a grading to a charge. These other relevant factors may see a grading for a charge either increased or decreased.
The other relevant factors that may see a Grading for a charge increase are called aggravating factors – these factors may see a player being awarded a higher penalty.
The other relevant factors that may see a Grading for a charge decreased are called mitigating factors – these factors may favour a player being award a lower penalty.
PROCESS
Match Review
FINAL DECESION
PROCESS
Match Review